A look at our game today

09-19-2014, 06:01 PM
#22

I kind of see what he is talking about, theoretically there are 2 outcomes; a win or a loss. So each game you play you have around 50% chance of winning that game solely based on the predicted outcomes. If the teams are always even then shouldn't the theory of large numbers start to play? The closer you are to a 50% win shouldn't this mean you're rankings are fairly accurate?

09-20-2014, 12:29 AM
#23

(09-19-2014, 06:01 PM)BFM. Wrote: I kind of see what he is talking about, theoretically there are 2 outcomes; a win or a loss. So each game you play you have around 50% chance of winning that game solely based on the predicted outcomes. If the teams are always even then shouldn't the theory of large numbers start to play? The closer you are to a 50% win shouldn't this mean you're rankings are fairly accurate?

Can't it be coded that ratings change automatically based on this?

09-20-2014, 01:18 AM
#24

(09-20-2014, 12:29 AM)castiel Wrote:(09-19-2014, 06:01 PM)BFM. Wrote: I kind of see what he is talking about, theoretically there are 2 outcomes; a win or a loss. So each game you play you have around 50% chance of winning that game solely based on the predicted outcomes. If the teams are always even then shouldn't the theory of large numbers start to play? The closer you are to a 50% win shouldn't this mean you're rankings are fairly accurate?

Can't it be coded that ratings change automatically based on this?

the game used to have ratings that changed per cap.. but what happens when you get that tard on your team who is trolling? your overall rating as a player is going to suffer because of your teammates?

09-20-2014, 01:52 AM
#25

(09-20-2014, 01:18 AM)hybridx Wrote:Ban the tard and don't count particular game.(09-20-2014, 12:29 AM)castiel Wrote:(09-19-2014, 06:01 PM)BFM. Wrote: I kind of see what he is talking about, theoretically there are 2 outcomes; a win or a loss. So each game you play you have around 50% chance of winning that game solely based on the predicted outcomes. If the teams are always even then shouldn't the theory of large numbers start to play? The closer you are to a 50% win shouldn't this mean you're rankings are fairly accurate?

Can't it be coded that ratings change automatically based on this?

the game used to have ratings that changed per cap.. but what happens when you get that tard on your team who is trolling? your overall rating as a player is going to suffer because of your teammates?

09-20-2014, 08:40 PM
#26

Neither the old nor the new rating system has anything to do with CTA stats being uploaded. Banning the tard might be appropriate, be it will have no affect on the ratings.

09-23-2014, 04:35 AM
#27

hmm.. well it appears i wasn't too off base with some of my comments in the first post here. looks like your wins actually do matter as they now have an influence on our top lists.

thoughts on this change?

thoughts on this change?

09-23-2014, 07:41 AM
#29

I got bumped out of the top 10, fuk dis

Aside from being bumped out, I support it. Some players have criticized the ratings system as a "popularity contest" and I think this gives them hope to rise the ranks. (Depending on how much win% matters)

Aside from being bumped out, I support it. Some players have criticized the ratings system as a "popularity contest" and I think this gives them hope to rise the ranks. (Depending on how much win% matters)

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)